ruipssilva Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 Hello I’ve been around and learning with all of you for a while now but it’s my first time posting. My name is Rui and I’m a Herc driver in the Portuguese Air Force…. I’m also a proud SUPT grad! I did some of my best flying in the states…unfortunately not in the Herc The question I have is simple: would you, as a crew, have any special consideration while dumping with an outboard engine on fire? I’m asking because it is not in the flight manual and there as been some discussion in my sqn. about how you should dump in that situation. Some have the opinion that you should dump from the opposite dump mast only (we fly H models with dump valves). Some others say the fuel spray pattern will be well clear of the engine.Any comments on that? Tks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C130H2FE Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 Before I would think about dumping, take care of the engine fire. Before you can dump enought fuel to matter you might have a wing off light. Point to be made is if you can't stop a fire on an engine, LAND! But I was to start dumping with a fire anywhere on a wing I would use the other dump mast only, why take a chance to futher complicate things, after all at this point a bad day is getting worse! My 2 cents worth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjvr99 Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 ..... I think management would forgive an overweight landing, if this is your reason for dumping. As C130H2FE says - deal with the fire first, then worry about the rest. One of our members told of his experience with an engine fire, which resulted in the engine falling off the wing in flight - can't find the story, though!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruipssilva Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Well, dealing with the fire first is a good advise …but my point is: you have an engine fire and deal with it, but, lets say your on departure and 3 engine climb performance is marginal, or, you might even be on the app. but a go around is always a possibility. As we all know 3 (or 2!!) engine performance might be marginal above certain GWs. So the scenario would be: engine fire, boldface (discharging both bottles) and now I need to loose some weight but I still see some smoke (and an occasional flame just to make it more fun) coming out of number 4! My climb performance is marginal and my number 3 is loosing oil px (yes…it’s one of those days). What would you do? Accept a lower dump rate (??) dumping from one side only and take your chances with the mountains or dump from both sides and take your chances with the fire? Will the fuel spray get any near that engine?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C130H2FE Posted March 22, 2009 Share Posted March 22, 2009 Dump rate from one mast is not much different that using both. As other post stated if the fire continues you might have the engine fall off as the Pope E model did. From what I have heard it is the only time an engine fell off and the plane was not lost, not something I want to try! If you do decide to dump from the wing with a engine fire will it ignite? Not sure, never asked that question before. I tend to think it will not ignite but it would be determined on how far back the flames extend behind the engine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NATOPS1 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) Scenario would be: engine fire, boldface (discharging both bottles) and now I need to loose some weight but I still see some smoke (and an occasional flame just to make it more fun) coming out of number 4! My climb performance is marginal and my number 3 is loosing oil px (yes…it’s one of those days). WHY NOT THROW IN A WINDMILLING PROP WHILE YOUR AT IT..... What would you do? Immediate return opposite direction....overweight landing and all.... Accept a lower dump rate (??) dumping from one side only and take your chances with the mountains or dump from both sides and take your chances with the fire? Dump from both based on your description…. (the dump outlets are quite a distance from your engine.) Run #3 until it runs out of oil/ oil pressure… (the reason for the immediate return) Will the fuel spray get any near that engine? No…. unless there is a wing structural failure due to the fire (exhaust area heat shield damaged…this fuel line is in the flapwell pretty well protected and if it were damaged you would not be able to dump from either side due to the manifold being pressurized all the way out to the outboard flap well area. (dump valves) Edited March 23, 2009 by NATOPS1 Add Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Wilson Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 By all means dump and dump from both masts, all you do by only using one dump mast is hurt yourself. Dumping in never a quick process and if you needlessly cut your rate in half then it just takes that much longer to get the weight off. Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Here is a link to the loss of 62-1838: http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WMRBK This aircraft was the "Lucky Duc" of the Kham Duc evacuation. Luck ran out this time. Ray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furd Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Minimum speed for fuel dumping is 167 kts indicated. Operation at or above this speed will ensure you are ahead of any flame front in the event of an engine fire. This minimum speed is FAA mandated for aircraft certification and flight operation. Edited April 15, 2009 by furd spelling error Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Herk Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Minimum speed for fuel dumping is 167 kts indicated. Operation at or above this speed will ensure you are ahead of any flame front in the event of an engine fire. This minimum speed is FAA mandated for aircraft certification and flight operation. And for those aircraft not FAA certified such as our classic versions of the venerable C-130? Didn't know the FAA had a min mandated speed...and how exactly do they test that you're ahead of the flame front? :eek: I'd like to watch those certification tests!:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc130fe Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 The question first and foremost should be...why is my engine on fire. If you think back 15 yrs or so, we had an AC-130H with the left wing on fire, and dumping hurt them more than helping. I understand that they had more than an enigne (full wing on fire) and a ruptured dump manifold dump more fuel on the fire, but dumping could be worst than better. As Dan Wilson said, getting the weight off is the best thing to do, but then agian, I would land at 155K+ if needed. Easier to talk about it on the old mans carpert, than 6 feet under ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC10FE Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I always thought that all dumping did was lead the fire department to the scene of the crash. Don R. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furd Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) If you are fast enough it would not matter what type of aircraft it was. The flame propagation rate ( flame advancement rate ) of any fuel would easily be calculated in a laboratory and I doubt if it was ever put to an actual flight test. That said the Australian Airforce had a display routine with their F111 at airshows that involved dumping fuel then igniting it with the afterburners. The aircraft flew the length of the runway at about 2000' with flaming fuel behind it and at an aircraft speed that was ahead of the flame front. A very impressive routine to observe. The DC8 that I flew many years ago had the minimum dump speed of 167kts listed in the QRH Emergency Proceedures for dumping fuel along with other airmanship considerations. The airline used those same considerations for all their aircraft types. Edited April 16, 2009 by furd Typing error Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruipssilva Posted April 18, 2009 Author Share Posted April 18, 2009 Besides the FAA reg. do you know if there is any L. Martin or USAF guidance on minimum dump speed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RZHill Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Isn't it 150 knots? RZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Herk Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Only guidance we have is above 5000' and not in a circular pattern... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Wilson Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 No minimum speed on our legacy herks, not sure about the wunnerful J model though. The gunship didn't have any ruptures to the dump manifold, it did however have several punctures through the manifolds coming out of the external tank, charring visible in the tank faring and wing surface just to the aft of the fairing, melted metal in the wing area above #2 engine (you know, the engine they said wasn't on fire) and NO evidence of charring or even sooting in the flap well area. That wreck is the thing that out and out told me AF safety investigations are crap. I would be hard pressed to find anything in that safety report that was factual - friggin idiot investigators. Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Herk Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 That wreck is the thing that out and out told me AF safety investigations are crap. Just that one, Dan? I'm not happy with several of them. In fairness, but not in defense, the SIB is given 30 days to investigate and complete their report. They have to prove nothing. They are supposed to use experienced dudes who have access to experts to come up with the most plausible course of action. All too often, they use the most convenient dudes... Quite often, they get it completely wrong. Let's not forget agendas, biases, and, yes, idiots. In comparison, the NTSB does not have a set time to determine anything, but they do need to have compelling evidence to make claims. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furd Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 And for those aircraft not FAA certified such as our classic versions of the venerable C-130? Didn't know the FAA had a min mandated speed...and how exactly do they test that you're ahead of the flame front? :eek: I'd like to watch those certification tests! Google "RAAF F111 fuel dump and burn" to see video's of their displays. You will not see any certification tests however this is the closest you will get to an aircraft with a trailing fuel fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.