Guest Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 I read in an article that the MC-130W Combat Spear* airplanes, which are modified from H2s, have a reinforced back end to allow the HSLLADS. Does anybody know if the structural beef-up is the same as the Combat Talon I and the Combat Talon II airplanes, with extruded rails and doublers from FS737 to FS1041? *Combat Spear, no longer referred to as Combat Wombat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herktowhale Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 The empennage is double skinned and it has a new exterior longeron stiffener. Same basic setup as the Talons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Herk Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 TalonOneTF wrote: *Combat Spear, no longer referred to as Combat Wombat At Cannon, I think they\'re using the callsign \"wombat\" & refer to themselves as \"whiskeys\" They\'re a wombat. :laugh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 I heard, but have not seen in writing, that Lockheed was claiming the J-model had incorporated the required structural strength into the empennage design, and was capable of doing HSLLADS without the external reinforcement. Too good to be true? I dunno.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Wilson Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 *Combat Spear, no longer referred to as Combat Wombat Regardless what the command structure thinks or wants, its always going to be a wombat Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 Another option for the \'W\' might be \"Wanna Be\"...I didn\'t think that up, I heard it from somebody else---honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Wilson Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Yeah but which wannabe are they? Do they wannabe an HC or an MC-P or an MC-E or an MC-H?????? Better watch out that nobody tries to stuff a cannon on that thing LOL Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Herk Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Dan Wilson wrote: Better watch out that nobody tries to stuff a cannon on that thing LOL ...or a spear! :laugh: :silly: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiskey1308 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 i work on the w\'s. yes the beef up is just like the combat talon\'s that i worked on before the w\'s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Ahhhh---memories. I was on the initial flight tests of HSLLADS after the structural mod on the first airplane. That goes back to 1968. We did a lot more than is currently allowed by procedures, but after all, it was a test (with instrumentation) to define and validate the limits. We blew out the single hydraulic actuator that was on the cargo door (at that time), and as a result, installed the dual door actuators, and the ramp/door sequencing switch. And by the way, the \"skin doubler\" below the rail from FS737 to 1041 is more than just a skin doubler---it\'s 3/16ths thick \"plate\" aluminum, rolled to conform to the contour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 US Herk wrote: TalonOneTF wrote: At Cannon, I think they\'re using the callsign \"wombat\" & refer to themselves as \"whiskeys\" They\'re a wombat. :laugh: Thanks for the C/S info. I heard WOMBAT-71 refueling a V-22 from Kirtland, and I have never heard the WOMBAT C/S before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.