bischoffm

Try T.O. 1C-130(H)H-4, Figure 124 on page 2-1029. Is what you are looking for the bracket that the pilots trim switch and mic switch mount to? If so, try part number KZ445

That page is missing out of my -4, oh well here are some more pictures let us know we are the right track

How is this if it not in these pictures we need to know the model or year group C-130!

The pressure reducer valve reduces the pressure from 3000 psi to 1275 +-75 with a cracking pressure of 1575.

Where the pressure relief valve will not let the pressure exceed 2300 psi and reseats at 1440psi

So when these two fail the pressure could possibly increase to max pump output pressure

"You guys need to treat your women better. Then maybe you'll just hear more of my favorite woman's retort

"Yes.....Oh My God YES" "

enough said!!!!

http://www.arpc.afrc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=8600

If you have access to mil secure go here, they will tell you if they ar ART jobs or just traditional positions.

Airmen looking for current vacancies in either the IMA program or unit program can view vacancies in the Reserve Management Vacancy System through AFPC Secure at

https://wwa.afpc.randolph.af.mil/afpcsecure.

-- Once logged into the secure site, click on "Reserve Vacancies."

If applying for an IMA assignment, submit an AF Form 1288, Application for Reserve Assignment, to the program manager identified in the advertisement.

For information on other Reserve options or career counseling, contact ARPC at 800-525-0102.

Point of Contact:

HQ ARPC/DPSC3

Assignments Branch

6760 E Irvington Pl

Denver CO 80280-2300

Here is the drawing. Little tough to read , but most people have been able to manage it

Tiny already for your retirement job!!!

The only hot food we had was what we heated with the hand held signal light.

But weren't you guys still rubbing sticks together make fire then??

Is this what you are looking for?

51-140-00 page 16C

YES, the urinal is still a big part of the problem in the ones without encapsulated latrines. They even put in one with a bigger opening in hopes they would not miss. I suggested the take the system out and make them sit down and pee. I guess it is not to MANLY. Also the jumpers may have issue, but the zipper suits are just to good to do it!!

Misc #1 P185 FH3406KT-32-6S-30 5935-01-373-3933 Harness PN 3329911-1

Misc #2 P127 FH3406KT-32-7S-30 5935-01-232-3360 Harness PN 3331947-1

Misc #3 P171 FH3406KT-28-16S30 5935-01-385-5945 Harness PN 3332866-1

Misc #4 P325 FH3406KT-32-8S-30 5935-01-373-3932 Harness PN 3332867-1

AC Gen #1 Harness PN 3332874-1

AC Gen #2 Harness PN 3332875-1

AC Gen Control Harnees PN 3332876-1

AC Gen Power 40/50KVA P121 MS3456KT28-22P30 5935-01-347-6417

AC Gen Power 60/90KVA P750 FH3406KT36-5P-30 5935-01-349-5939

AC Gen Control P408 FH3406KT18-11P-30 5935-01-374-9290

Is this what your looking for??

Compare these drawings you may find your answer! The AVR-869 undervolt relay (in TO) and the AVR-869C sequence relay are linked in FEDLOG because they are the same. AVR-869E sequence relay is different. Maybe thats the issue! Thst is of course I'm reading the pictures right!

If you can find the part numbers ( instead of SN) on the wing these might help.

I know we modified alot of aircraft with the 'E' model wings because they had external mounted fuel probe saving fuel cell work when changing them. All of the H1's at Elmendorf where changed to 'E' wings between 97-02, I think all the H1's at least had 'E' model wing put on them. Warner Robins themselves might have a SN list of the outer wings and where they are.

1968 is when aircraft were new center wing.

TCTO 1039 RETROFIT INSTALLATION OF REDESIGNED OUTER WING, C-130 AIRCRAFT, dated, 1 OCTOBER 1983, was done to the outer wings. 72-01299 was the last aircraft to have that done to it.

So any of the book weights should be good.

That's it Tiny! The drawing requirement was removed for the -3 a little bit ago I cannot tell you why they did not update the drawing. Maybe they are just seeing if it will work preventing cracks. Because we all know that phenolic scrappers are all that have been used on the truss mounts.

The C-130 have always made sense and there has never been questions left up to interpretation!!! :)

TO 1C-130A-3 54-30-00 Page 4: Says,

(26) Reinstall sway brace using AMS-G-6032 grease or equivalent. Coat bore of hole and bolt,and torque to 150-200 inch-pounds leaving squeezed out grease in place.

If you seal the bolts in yes it may help prevent them from spinning; however, scrapping the sealant off for the NDI inspection for cracks make cause more damage.

MIL-C-3164 , Containers, Bottles, Jugs, Pitchers, and Servers, Insulated and Vacuum (S/S by

FED SPECS RR-B-600, 7330002854299 2 quart

RR-J-800 7330002247051 1 gallon

RR-J-800 7330002722527 2 gallon

RR-P-375 7330000440653 1 liter plastic and glass isulation

7330014677718 2 gallon Marine corp green

hope this helps!!

You guys have called the brake control valves good, right!!

..I think that ice chocks showed above are useless on a high power run!!

Those ice chocks worked very well in Alaska!

They where sitting on ice (probably) and you've seen the rest of the story.

Inexperience was probably the biggest factor, because jumping chocks will never happen to me!!

I read something recently (if I recall correctly) in the Loadmaster newsletter (put out by AMC) that they were pretty happy with the headsets and they were trying to secure funding for them.

Don't hold you breath getting money out of AMC's hands especilly if it another MAJCOM idea.

Because of this mishap we had a FCIF come out from HQ AFSOC on Thurs afternoon and the short version is Aircrew will run engines for mx if either of these conditions are present,

32 F or below

snow and ice

anything above ground idle

and if max power is required we have to take it to the runway to do so

another great knee jerk reaction :eek:

AFSOC said it WAS a reaction until the SIB is complete.

We want to keep the aircrew out of maintenance runs thats for sure (no offense!)!!

Also here is a picture of the ice chocks we used at Elmendorf!!

AFSOC tested some aimed primarily at FARP operations - wasn't super successful - lots of bleed-over onto radios and other issues - sounded like they were in a tin can too. I'm sure technology has evolved enough since the mid-late '90s when this was tested - would be good to have.

Knowing AFSOC they probably where using a tin cans then with cotton string, thats why they were WIRELESS!!!

Make sure the detector brackets are not loose and wire is not chaffing anywhere in the nacelle

Congrats, did you TACK them on well??