Jump to content

DC10FE

Members
  • Posts

    1,097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by DC10FE

  1. If I'm not mistaken, the first C-130H-30 from the factory was for the Indonesian AF, A-1317 (4864). There were other after-market modifications, but 4864 was the first one from Marietta. I know the Brits stretched a bunch of their K-models in the mid to late 1980's.

    Don R.

  2. They're getting rid of the Credible Sport airplane because it has no historical value.

    In another thread, US Herk wrote this about Credible Sport's historical value. I agree with him,

    Don R.

    "The Credible Sport aircraft is historically significant regardless of whether or not that aircraft ever actually flew, or if any of them ever actually accomplished their intended goal. Why do they keep all sorts of one-off aircraft like the XB-70 Valkyrie or some of those goofy helicopter experiments? Because they furthered the USAF mission one way or another. Credible Sport was a daring answer to an incredible challenge, one we didn't have the political backbone for. The crash was tragic, but from the ashes of Eagle Claw/Desert One, and everything that went into it, to include the Credible Sport program, rose the phoenix of SOCOM and AFSOC. Had that not happened, where would we be today in The War Against Terror? How could we quickly respond? Where would we have been in Haiti when STS controllers worked more aircraft into Port Au Prince than Miami International all on a card table and walkie talkie? Where would we have been in any of our recent conflicts? Who would have led the Apaches in on night one of Desert Storm? Who would've taken out Bin Laden?

    No, Credible Sport is more historically significant for what it did not accomplish than a "dime a dozen" aircraft any day..."

  3. They also have a C-119 with a jet engine on top that was used in the remake of Flight of the Phoenix - they airbrushed the jet engine out.

    Sam,

    Just picking a nit here and I may be mistaken, but I think the airplane in the movie was a C-82 Packet with the jet pack removed. I haven't seen the movie in a very long time, but the major difference between the C-119 and the C-82 is that the C-119's cockpit was moved forward so it doesn't have the big nose like the C-82.

    Don R.

  4. Bob,

    If you go to Google Earth, there are what looks like 4 operational C-130's on the east side of RWY 01 along with a 2-engine C-130 there, too. On the west side if the runway are 2 C-130's that look like they're stored along with a couple of 707's. I would assume they are the ex-USN F-models. The photo was taken almost a year ago on 12/10, so I really haven't answered your question, have I?

    Don R.

  5. BTW did anyone notice that the first of the 74 H models to become a ground trainer is at Sheppard.74-1676. Those 74's weren't born yet when I got off AD.

    Getting the train back on the tracks, I remember picking up 2 of the 74 H-models at the factory. One was 74-2063 -- don't remember the other one. Until we got rid of all the E-models, the FE had to carry 2 sets of the -1 and the 1-1. What a hassle!

    Oh, and no, before anyone beats me to it I didn't stand fire guard with a bucket of sand and a burlap bag.

    OK, you gun-runners can go back to the "98 Krag."

    Don R.

  6. Book Review: “The Lockheed Martin C-130 Hercules: A Complete History”, by Peter C. Smith (Crecy Publishing, latest printing 2010).

    My first recommendation is DO NOT PURCHASE THIS BOOK—IT IS A WASTE OF MONEY (list price $49.95).

    I'm with Mark on this. I have a copy of Smith's book published in 2001 and it, too, is full of inaccuracies. Somewhere, I have a 2-page list of pure BS from the book. It's an insult to anyone with even a limited knowledge of the Herc. When he gets into the lists of foreign militaries and commercial operators, he imagination really takes off!

    If someone wants a definitive book on the Herc, go out and buy Joe Dabney's book, "Herk: Hero of the Skies." I have both the 1979 edition and the one published in 1986.

    Don R.

  7. OK, here goes.

    When I was flying for St. Lucia Airways, we were departing Miami International for somewhere south. We were at least number 20 for takeoff on runway 9, so the captain decided to shut down the inboards. As we slowly got closer to the runway, we began to start up the inboards. We got rotation on #2 but no light-off. No problem -- we were empty, so we'd just do a 3-engine take off. When we tried to start #3, same problem; rotation, but no ignition. The FO called the tower and told them we had a problem and had to go back to the cargo ramp. As we were taxiing back on the runway, I looked down and got one of those mini-anxiety attacks. I then suggested we try again, only this time with the condition levers in run, not ground stop. Fortunately, an Arrow Air DC-8 told the tower we could get back in line in front of him.

    I got a lot more, including the unintentional no-flap takeoff, but this is the most embarrassing.

    Don R.

  8. Good airplane! Flew it for 18 months in Angola when it was PJ-TAC with Frameair. Delivered to Luanda in August 1991 with only 60 hours on the airframe. Sold to Lynden with only 6,600 hours. It sat for a very long time at Sogerma.

    Don R.

  9. For example, C-130A 56-0511, owned and operated by Internatiional Air Response nows bears civil reg. number N121TG. I know the N indicates the acft. is US registered and that other countries have an assigned first letter. That pretty much exhausts my knowledge of the subject. Perhaps Don can add to this.

    My guess is that the "TG" suffix is from when T&G Aviation owned and operated the airplane. Just like 56-0507 registered as N132HP with Hawkins & Powers. Like Giz said, vanity plates.

    Don R.

×
×
  • Create New...