Jump to content

NATOPS1

Members
  • Posts

    785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by NATOPS1

  1. " *Throttle already at FLIGHT IDLE, TQ remain : 1.40 lbs. -After about 10 sec TQ increase to 3.4lbs."

     

    It sounds like you are not producing pressure. Agree with Fred change the pump housing. If the blade angle does not change  due to low pump pressure your prop will overspeed every single time.

    (If you have removed your syncrophaser from the rack and have the same indications in Mech)

     

    Question is it a normal practice to run two engines to high power with the others shutdown?

    Can you tell me what is the normal engine oil pressure is for your aircraft?

     

     

  2. Check and make sure the Voltage Reg manufacture is the same as the Generator; there are two different types with different operating voltages. The newer system can tell what GEN/VR is installed the older cannot and may cause failure. 

    You may have a "Bus" failure if it is the same Gen each time.

    A second Gen failure on the same wing when the load is switched would be a good indication of a Bus failure  .  

  3. Agree with Mark, as for the flag, maybe the civilian figure could pass the flag to a veteran... We the military "work" for our civilian population and then that civilian population gives thanks to a veteran for the sacrifices and service. I would keep the bell tolling at the conclusion that is kind of special and would cement the thought in everyone's mind that the Freedoms we have are not free.

     

    Good luck let us know how it goes.

  4. Is it only one side that takes 8 minutes?

    There are two flow regulators and one snubber for each side.

    Make sure the snubber actuator lever working and not out of alignment/adjustment. It should only slow the last few inches of travel.

    If it is both MLG sides it is a flow problem. Does the Nose work ok?

     

     

     

  5. This is a new one...

    The gear box inner bearing diaphragms/ bearings are obviously moving causing the idler gear and gears for the starter generator to move. That movement in turn causing failures; the compressor may be a separate issue.

    If the internal gearbox movement is being transmitted thru the torque shaft to the engine it (for/aft travel) should be stopped at the air inlet housing as it has a "ball" bearing and should prevent the for aft movement prior to the compressor...

  6. I would say you need to pull the floor boards, depuddle and ventilate until you have the fuel cleared out.

    If you want to make the decision easy all you need to do is remember the underfloor heat system pumps out bleedair straight from the manifold and if it cycles (IE overheats) that temperature is 180 degrees at the sensor...

  7. Agree with the starter control valve possibility. What is the time to start? There should not be enough energy to make the engine start in a short period of time it should be at the upper limit.

  8. So many configurations now anything is possible. If this is a requirement for your aircraft ask your COM/NAV shop to look at the wiring diagram. That will be the only real way to know why...

  9. If we are talking about ground operations closing the bleed air would reduce the TIT which would reduce the temperature inside the engine but oil temp is most likely not going to be reduced much if at all.

    Better idea operate the engine in LSGI and advance the throttle towards flight idle one or two knobs worth to increase the flow of air thru the cooler. The reduced RPM and increased airflow should help keep your oil temps good you can cycle the engines (inboard/outboard) between HSGI and LSGI to cool oil and keep your electrics.

  10. The wing structure is designed to withstand the stress of torque twisting the nacelle off the wing as well as the pull and push moments experienced during forward and reverse thrust. The stress to pull the aircraft through the air (and the nacelle off the wing) would be greater than the stress of the reverse thrust which would try and push the nacelle onto the wing... The wing structure is designed to absorb the 19,600 (+) Tq and  the pushing/ pulling stress would be factored in as well. Reverse thrust is a fraction 19,600.

  11. ​I agree this can be an indicator of fuel control health, but please don't take it for more than it is. Even if the engine will low speed, you never know if the fuel governor is correctly set anyway without doing the correct ops check, so the LSGI operation is of low value as an indicator you have overspeed protection. Maintenance performs the ops check every HSC and ISO, so you should be covered. Sure, something could break in-between, but it's not as simple as that. The flyweights that tell the governor it is overspeeding are the same flyweights that assist the speed servo valve to increase fuel flow during engine starting, so if that mechanism were malfunctioning, you would likely see more severe issues with fuel flow. The only fuel governor components not needed by the speed servo valve are a spring and a shaft.

    The only true ops check for fuel cutoff is to do a fuel governor/pitchlock check. If the you are willing to tail swap for an engine that fails to low speed, you should be prepared to allow maintenance to do an official ops check of the fuel control to prevent a tail swap, especially when the LSGI solenoid is exempted on the MESL. In my experience, the entire LSGI system is infinitely less reliable than the fuel governor system. By all means, call maintenance out, but please, let us do an official ops check before refusing the aircraft.

    ​What Lkuest said... ;-)

  12. The LSGI and Fuel toping do come from the same place, the LSGI reset changes the tension on the governor to set the speed. I guess you could say it "checks" the fuel toping but not really (IMHO) but it does check to see if the valve is moving towards the reduce fuel position so I can see how it could be said it checks toping. Works for me...

     

    Me likes Spectre's reply!!!.... Normal Ground Idle...;) just seemed the right thing to do ,ha ha. Bill

  13. If you have an operators manual it should have specific KIAS in the landing section. Reverse at high airspeeds (115 maybe) could cause flameout and directional control problems. As for the stresses if you think about the torque generated during reverse the prop/eng/wing is actually several thousand IN lbs below the 19.6 torque limit.

    Air flow is the issue in the engine.

  14. in my point of you this is due to that inner engines prop give more stabilize operation than outer ( i heard that gusty wind conditions can cause rpm fluctuations ) during manoeuvring of aircraft effect will be greater on outer engines may some other logics could be there but i heard this

×
×
  • Create New...